Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 6:24:28 GMT
The defendant (it never prohibits it when used in favor of the de, it is noted that most decisions have been favorable to taxpayers, as long as they have duly proven that the samples are directly relatge Sergio Fernando Moro, the Federal Supreme Court invalidated all decisions made within the scope of criminal actio, which naturally led to the emptying of the evidence collection produced from the deliberations of the aforementioned magistrate" (page 12) But, contrary to the law, the National Treasury said: "Finally, the STF did not acquit the defendant Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
It did not address the merits of the conviction. It was not stated, at any time, that the defendant is innocent, but it was considered that it was not within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Paraná judge him in those specific cases. For the STF, the sentence given in Paraná was irregular and, therefore, invalid" (page 19) In the decision, Minister Gilmar responded: "The distinction between Belgium Phone Number Data 'irregular sentence' and 'innocence', made by the unwary reviewer, is crystal frivolous. Such a statement by the National Treasury attorney, partially covered by the act complained of, has clear teratological contours and a certain ideological coloring.
As much as it does not demonstrate, rather, some intellectual fragility, for disregarding something that is known to any student in the third semester of a Law course: in the absence of a criminal conviction sentence, any citizen does retain the state of innocence" (page 19). The minister was even generous when he said "a certain ideological burden". He was measured in his criticism, so to speak, taking into account the obviousness of the circumstances. In any case, what is important is to talk about the role of law in democracy. And lawfare . What the PGFN did was this: political use of the law against an opponent . Hence the minister's criticism about "a certain ideological burden That simple.
It did not address the merits of the conviction. It was not stated, at any time, that the defendant is innocent, but it was considered that it was not within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Paraná judge him in those specific cases. For the STF, the sentence given in Paraná was irregular and, therefore, invalid" (page 19) In the decision, Minister Gilmar responded: "The distinction between Belgium Phone Number Data 'irregular sentence' and 'innocence', made by the unwary reviewer, is crystal frivolous. Such a statement by the National Treasury attorney, partially covered by the act complained of, has clear teratological contours and a certain ideological coloring.
As much as it does not demonstrate, rather, some intellectual fragility, for disregarding something that is known to any student in the third semester of a Law course: in the absence of a criminal conviction sentence, any citizen does retain the state of innocence" (page 19). The minister was even generous when he said "a certain ideological burden". He was measured in his criticism, so to speak, taking into account the obviousness of the circumstances. In any case, what is important is to talk about the role of law in democracy. And lawfare . What the PGFN did was this: political use of the law against an opponent . Hence the minister's criticism about "a certain ideological burden That simple.